10,000 B.C. Critic Reviews

Metascore®:

38 =
Based upon 13 Critic Reviews
See all 10,000 B.C. reviews at
Sorted by:
Los Angeles Times | Kenneth TuranAdd Critic to Favorites

10,000 BC is as crazy as it wants to be, plundering the past and other movies with that peculiar Hollywood combination of the earnest and the preposterous that can result in the guiltiest of guilty pleasures.Read the full review

The Hollywood Reporter | Kirk HoneycuttAdd Critic to Favorites

As one might expect, there are campy moments and far too much reliance on God-like interventions in the affairs of early man. Less expected is that 10,000 BC works just fine as an action Western with handsome actors in striking costumes and a few CG predators, which are giddy fun.Read the full review

The New York Times | A.O. ScottAdd Critic to Favorites

The big, climactic fight, complete with an epic snuffleupagus rampage, is decent action-movie fun. And as a history lesson, 10,000 BC has its value. It explains just how we came to be the tolerant, peace-loving farmers we are today, and why the pyramids were never finished.Read the full review

The Onion (A.V. Club) | Keith PhippsAdd Critic to Favorites

"The Day After Tomorrow" was kind of stupidly fun, and 10,000 B.C. might be too, if it weren't so stupidly dull.Read the full review

Variety | Todd McCarthyAdd Critic to Favorites

Conventional where it should be bold and mild where it should be wild, 10,000 BC reps a missed opportunity to present an imaginative vision of a prehistoric moment.Read the full review

USA Today | Claudia PuigAdd Critic to Favorites

Within a few minutes into the ponderous prehistoric pseudo-epic that is 10,000 B.C., you find yourself longing for George of the Jungle to crash into a tree or the Geico cavemen to amble up and put an end to the droning seriousness of this tedious tale.Read the full review

ReelViews | James BerardinelliAdd Critic to Favorites

One doesn't expect intelligent scripting or deep characterization from Roland Emmerich, but the film's lack of energy, poor special effects, and monotonous pacing lead to an inescapable conclusion: 10,000 B.C. isn't only brain-dead, it's COMPLETELY dead. It's inert and without a heartbeat.Read the full review

Washington Post | Ann HornadayAdd Critic to Favorites

One part Joseph Campbell hero quest, one part multi-culti morality tale, one part live-action "Flintstones" cartoon, 10,000 B.C. is finally every part just plain nuts, from a hike featuring more ecosystems than an Al Gore documentary to a wacky climax set amid pyramids that -- you'll e-mail me if I'm wrong -- wouldn't have been built for another 7,000 years or so.Read the full review

Boston Globe | Ty BurrAdd Critic to Favorites

So, yea, it is a stinker. But it is prophesied that in six months time you shall come across 10,000 B.C.’ in the land of Pay-Per-View. And you shall say: ‘‘Pass the popcorn.’’Read the full review

Rolling Stone | Peter TraversAdd Critic to Favorites

Call it "Apocalypto" for pussies -- a PG-13 rating, puh-leese! -- or prehistory for peabrains. Just don’t call it friendo. 10,000 B.C. will take your money, rob your time and hit your brain like a shot of Novacaine.Read the full review

Track Your Favorite Critics | Start Now