Be Cool Critic Reviews

Metascore®:

43 =
Based upon 16 Critic Reviews
See all Be Cool reviews at
Sorted by:
San Francisco Chronicle | Mick LaSalleAdd Critic to Favorites

It's instantly forgettable, but smooth fun most of the way.Read the full review

The Hollywood Reporter | Kirk HoneycuttAdd Critic to Favorites

Be Cool is not really cool as "Get Shorty" was, but it's entertaining, a frivolous cocktail rather than a vintage wine.Read the full review

USA Today | Mike ClarkAdd Critic to Favorites

Despite a cast and production that seem to promise one of the year's first movies of any note, Cool never translates its promo-photo flashiness into authenticity on screen.Read the full review

The Onion (A.V. Club) | Scott TobiasAdd Critic to Favorites

Be Cool more often evokes the image of a screenwriter furiously trying draft after draft to accommodate all the stars. Accommodating the audience becomes a distant priority.Read the full review

Entertainment Weekly | Lisa SchwarzbaumAdd Critic to Favorites

The hell of it is, Be Cool is tepid entertainment that could be cool if it spent less time entertaining us as if we were demanding a definition of rhythm.Read the full review

Slate | David EdelsteinAdd Critic to Favorites

Travolta keeps you grooving even when the movie's motor runs down--although it has never revved too high to begin with.Read the full review

ReelViews | James BerardinelliAdd Critic to Favorites

Lacks both a focus and an edge, making it an amorphous mess.Read the full review

The New York Times | Manohla DargisAdd Critic to Favorites

Like the characters, the scenes pile up but go nowhere; the story seems fragmented, the actors unmotivated, unmoored. Mr. Gray has a feel for pulp, but is seriously off his game here.Read the full review

Washington Post | Stephen HunterAdd Critic to Favorites

It's kind of -- hmmmm, less than good, a little better than not bad, almost all right, mediocre without being grating, sort of in the C-minus-to-C-minus-minus range.Read the full review

Chicago Sun-Times | Roger EbertAdd Critic to Favorites

A classic species of bore: a self-referential movie with no self to refer to. One character after another, one scene after another, one cute line of dialogue after another, refers to another movie, a similar character, a contrasting image, or whatever.Read the full review

Track Your Favorite Critics | Start Now