Clerks Critic Reviews

Metascore®:

74 =
Based upon 10 Critic Reviews
See all Clerks reviews at
Sorted by:
Los Angeles Times | Kenneth TuranAdd Critic to Favorites

Though the politically incorrect language is tough enough to have earned Clerks an initial NC-17 rating (re-rated R on appeal), its exuberance gives it an alive and kicking feeling that is welcome and rare. [19 Oct 1994]Read the full review

ReelViews | James BerardinelliAdd Critic to Favorites

Nothing, no matter how outrageous, is beyond Smith, and his willingness to flaunt cinematic taboos is one of the reasons why Clerks is such a unqualified success.Read the full review

Wall Street Journal | Amy GamermanAdd Critic to Favorites

Rough around the edges, it's humor decidedly sophomoric in parts. But that's part of its charm. [19 Jan 1995, p.A16(E)]Read the full review

Variety | Todd McCarthyAdd Critic to Favorites

A randy, irreverent, slice-of-life no-budgeter that's played for laughs and gets them.Read the full review

Chicago Sun-Times | Roger EbertAdd Critic to Favorites

Within the limitations of his bare-bones production, Smith shows great invention, a natural feel for human comedy, and a knack for writing weird, sometimes brilliant, dialogue.Read the full review

Entertainment Weekly | Owen GleibermanAdd Critic to Favorites

The latest slacker manifesto, Clerks lacks the grunge artistry of either "Stranger Than Paradise" or "Slacker," but it's a fast, likable 90 minutes at the movies.Read the full review

Washington Post | Desson ThomsonAdd Critic to Favorites

Much of "Clerks" is extremely funny and dead-on—in terms of its intentionally satirical, Gen-X-istential gloom.Read the full review

The New York Times | Elvis MitchellAdd Critic to Favorites

[Smith] also has an uncommonly sure sense of deadpan comic timing. [25 Mar 1994, p.C10]Read the full review

USA Today | Mike ClarkAdd Critic to Favorites

A few crude verbal exchanges nearly got Clerks an NC-17 rating; some (not all) of these provide some of the funniest moments in a film that's funny about 30% of the time. [24 Oct 1994]Read the full review

Washington Post | Hal HinsonAdd Critic to Favorites

Amateurishly acted, clumsily edited and slapped together out of what looks like surveillance camera footage, the thing bumps along not so much on talent as on audacity.Read the full review

Track Your Favorite Critics | Start Now