Fallen Angels (1998) Critic Reviews

Metascore®:

72 =
Based upon 5 Critic Reviews
See all Fallen Angels (1998) reviews at
Sorted by:
Los Angeles Times | Kevin ThomasAdd Critic to Favorites

An exhilarating rush of a movie, with all manner of go-for-broke visual bravura that expresses perfectly the free spirits of his bold young people. [22 May 1998, Pg.F9]Read the full review

Chicago Sun-Times | Roger EbertAdd Critic to Favorites

To describe the plot is to miss the point. Fallen Angels takes the materials of the plot -- the characters and what they do -- and assembles them like a photo montage. At the end, you have impressions, not conclusions.Read the full review

San Francisco Chronicle | Edward GuthmannAdd Critic to Favorites

It's hard to follow, the characters are ill-defined, and the wide-angle shots used by Wong's perennial cinematographer, Christopher Doyle, are deliberately unflattering.Read the full review

Variety | Leonard KladyAdd Critic to Favorites

Abetted by the piercing images of lenser Christopher Doyle, the picture has a vivid, nightmarish quality that's more inviting than repellent. But the filmmaker mutes the impact by repeatedly cutting away to other settings, as if he lacked confidence in the power of the moment.Read the full review

The New York Times | Stephen HoldenAdd Critic to Favorites

Fallen Angels certainly abounds in visual pizazz, clever in jokes and trendy pop references, but such things can carry a movie only so far.Read the full review

Track Your Favorite Critics | Start Now