Fear (1996) Critic Reviews

Metascore®:

59 =
Based upon 7 Critic Reviews
See all Fear (1996) reviews at
Sorted by:
San Francisco Chronicle | Mick LaSalleAdd Critic to Favorites

It's a maddening, satisfying, junky, enjoyable picture.Read the full review

Washington Post | Hal HinsonAdd Critic to Favorites

Fear is pretty much a cheap-thrills fix; the ideas, such as they are, function as window dressing. Still, cheap though these thrills may be, they are genuinely thrilling.Read the full review

Variety | Emanuel LevyAdd Critic to Favorites

The thriller telegraphs most of its suspense payoffs, and the audience is almost always ahead of the game. What's most disappointing is that the characters begin as well-etched individuals, but are gradually turned into mere plot functions.Read the full review

Los Angeles Times | Jack MathewsAdd Critic to Favorites

Fear, thanks mostly to Foley's stylish direction and a couple of strong performances, is a much better movie than "Whispers," but those familiar with the formula will get no major surprises. [12 Apr 1996]Read the full review

The New York Times | Stephen HoldenAdd Critic to Favorites

A nasty little thriller that starts out on a somewhat higher plane but eventually trades in its level head for conventional scare tactics and violence.Read the full review

Boston Globe | Matthew GilbertAdd Critic to Favorites

Fear is a formulaic thriller that is like "Cape Fear" meets "Fatal Attraction," or "Splendor in the Grass" on crack, but without a hint of those movies' psychological complexities and camp moments. [12 Apr 1996]Read the full review

ReelViews | James BerardinelliAdd Critic to Favorites

A kinetic, visually dazzling thriller that's actually a notch above many of its predecessors - albeit only a small notch.Read the full review

Track Your Favorite Critics | Start Now