Gladiator (2000) Critic Reviews

Metascore®:

65 =
Based upon 12 Critic Reviews
See all Gladiator (2000) reviews at
Sorted by:
Entertainment Weekly | Lisa SchwarzbaumAdd Critic to Favorites

What matters for today's hero is the good fight, and Gladiator KOs us with a doozy.Read the full review

Rolling Stone | Peter TraversAdd Critic to Favorites

Glorious, a colossus of rousing action and ferocious fun.Read the full review

Variety | Todd McCarthyAdd Critic to Favorites

John Mathieson's widescreen cinematography is magnificent, and the pacing across 2½ hours is well modulated.Read the full review

Washington Post | Desson ThomsonAdd Critic to Favorites

One extended guilty pleasure.Read the full review

San Francisco Chronicle | Mick LaSalleAdd Critic to Favorites

At 2 1/2 hours, Gladiator is a long ride, but it doesn't drag.Read the full review

Boston Globe | Jay CarrAdd Critic to Favorites

It epitomizes the kind of high-profile bloodshed we now expect to herald the hazy, lazy, blockbuster-fixated days of summer.Read the full review

USA Today | Susan WloszczynaAdd Critic to Favorites

Instead of the heat of humanity, what lingers on in the mind is the cool of the computerized effects.Read the full review

The New York Times | A.O. ScottAdd Critic to Favorites

Grandiose and silly.Read the full review

Los Angeles Times | Kenneth TuranAdd Critic to Favorites

Like an aging athlete who knows how to husband strength and camouflage weaknesses, it makes the most of what it does well and hopes you won't notice its limitations.Read the full review

Chicago Sun-Times | Roger EbertAdd Critic to Favorites

It employs depression as a substitute for personality, and believes that if the characters are bitter and morose enough, we won't notice how dull they are.Read the full review

Track Your Favorite Critics | Start Now