Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire Critic Reviews

Sorted by:
Boston Globe | Ty BurrAdd Critic to Favorites

Goblet of Fire is the entry in which Rowling finally took off the gloves.Read the full review

Chicago Sun-Times | Roger EbertAdd Critic to Favorites

The film is more violent, less cute than the others, but the action is not the mindless destruction of a video game; it has purpose, shape and style.Read the full review

Entertainment Weekly | Owen GleibermanAdd Critic to Favorites

Kids may be appropriately terrified, but to this overgrown Potter fan, Voldemort, the Darth Vader of the black arts, was a heck of a lot scarier when you couldn't see him.Read the full review

Los Angeles Times | Kenneth TuranAdd Critic to Favorites

It's not until Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire that a film has successfully re-created the sense of stirring magical adventure and engaged, edge-of-your-seat excitement that has made the books such an international phenomenon.Read the full review

ReelViews | James BerardinelliAdd Critic to Favorites

Imperfect, but magical nonetheless.Read the full review

Rolling Stone | Peter TraversAdd Critic to Favorites

With the cast getting looser and the mind games kinkier, it's hard to resist.Read the full review

San Francisco Chronicle | Ruthe SteinAdd Critic to Favorites

Offers a brew of wondrous chimera combined with the wonders of human nature.Read the full review

Slate | David EdelsteinAdd Critic to Favorites

No, I couldn't be more pleased with what the screenwriter, Steven Kloves, and the director, Mike Newell, have wrought this time.Read the full review

The Hollywood Reporter | Kirk HoneycuttAdd Critic to Favorites

The best one yet.Read the full review

The New York Times | Manohla DargisAdd Critic to Favorites

His (Ralph Fiennes) Voldemort may be the greatest screen performance ever delivered without the benefit of a nose; certainly it's a performance of sublime villainy.Read the full review

Track Your Favorite Critics | Start Now