August 21, 2009
it had good special effects, but it didn't follow the book.
August 21, 2009
The movie was entertaining and all but barely followed the book at all. The whole movie was about 3 hours of "love and comedy"! I was expecting a lot more action from this movie, I was highly disappointing. I still enjoyed it but I feel it could have followed the book and it could have been better.
July 29, 2009
So my husband and I went to see Harry Potter in 3D....IT SUCKED MONKEY BUTT!!! The film only had TWENTY MINUTES of 3D effects and they charged an extra FOUR DOLLARS per ticket to see it!! What a scam!!!!!!!!!! I am officially boycotting Warner Brothers/Time/AOL/Whatever the hell they are calling themselves these days!!!!!! (PS The movie is still amazing! I would have seen it again anyway, but the
The movie is terrific. But DON'T WASTE YOUR MONEY on the IMAX version! No one tells you in advance ********* only in 3-D for the first 20-30 minutes, then it's just big screen. And frankly, the 3-D is more distracting than a bonus. I was relieved when it stopped. See it in a regular theatre, and enjoy!
July 17, 2009
This movie was horrible. The dialogue among many of the key characterswas minimal. The interaction character was sparse at best, that is ofthe characters they even bother to include in the movie. Since thethird movie, I've been left wondering if the directors and scriptwritershave actually taken the time to read the books. I do understand that ifmost of the content in the books was to be