Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone Critic Reviews

Sorted by:
The New York Times | A.O. ScottAdd Critic to Favorites

Given that movies can now show us everything, the manifestations that Ms. Rowling described could be less magical only if they were delivered at a news conference.Read the full review

San Francisco Chronicle | Bob GrahamAdd Critic to Favorites

Absolutely the best single moment, beautifully presented, comes when the orphaned Harry looks in a mirror and sees his parents there. It is brilliant in its simplicity and very moving.Read the full review

USA Today | Claudia PuigAdd Critic to Favorites

Though the film will undoubtedly please the young viewers who flock to it, ultimately many of the book's readers may wish for a more magical incarnation.Read the full review

Slate | David EdelsteinAdd Critic to Favorites

As a movie, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone has no inner life -- no pulse -- of its own: It's secondhand.Read the full review

Washington Post | Desson ThomsonAdd Critic to Favorites

Retains (and in many cases, boosts) as much of the spirit [of the book] as you could reasonably expect. And it makes a worthy attempt to duplicate Rowling's engaging sense of humor.Read the full review

Boston Globe | Jay CarrAdd Critic to Favorites

A firm, ringing yes and no on Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. The best thing about it may be that it will lead many back to read -- or re-read -- the book.Read the full review

Wall Street Journal | Joe MorgensternAdd Critic to Favorites

What's on screen, though, is a cautious approach to cinema wizardry -- broad, colorful strokes and flash-bang effects that turn J.K. Rowling's words into a long, cheerful spectacle with a Muggle soul.Read the full review

Los Angeles Times | Kenneth TuranAdd Critic to Favorites

What saves Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is what created it in the first place: J.K. Rowling's enrapturing imagination. At those sporadic moments when the film allows us to share in Harry's wonder, it lets us recapture our own as well.Read the full review

Entertainment Weekly | Lisa SchwarzbaumAdd Critic to Favorites

That sense of déjà vu is at once this Harry Potter's balm and its limitation: many charms, but few surprises.Read the full review

Rolling Stone | Peter TraversAdd Critic to Favorites

Is the movie any good? At the dawn of the twenty-first century, when art is defined by commerce, this question is beside the point.Read the full review

Track Your Favorite Critics | Start Now