Interview With The Vampire. Critic Reviews

Metascore®:

66 =
Based upon 10 Critic Reviews
See all Interview With The Vampire. reviews at
Sorted by:
USA Today | Mike ClarkAdd Critic to Favorites

The generally faithful script is by Anne Rice herself, the director is "The Crying Game"'s Neil Jordan, and both seem true to themselves and as true as they can be to artistic and visceral expectations. [11Nov1994 Pg. 01.D]Read the full review

The New York Times | Elvis MitchellAdd Critic to Favorites

His sumptuous film is as strange and mesmerizing as it is imaginatively ghastly. It's a sophisticated, spookily intense rendering of Ms. Rice's story.Read the full review

Chicago Sun-Times | Roger EbertAdd Critic to Favorites

A stronger plot engine might have drawn us more quickly to the end, but on a scene by scene basis, Interview with the Vampire is a skillful exercise in macabre imagination.Read the full review

Rolling Stone | Peter TraversAdd Critic to Favorites

But for all its visionary brilliance, the movie version of Interview never lets us close enough to see ourselves in Louis. We're dazzled but unmoved.Read the full review

ReelViews | James BerardinelliAdd Critic to Favorites

When Interview with the Vampire works, it's as compelling and engrossing a piece of entertainment as is available on film today. When it falters, the weaknesses seem magnified.Read the full review

Variety | Todd McCarthyAdd Critic to Favorites

But the film also has its turgid, dialogue-heavy stretches, and the leading performances, if acceptable, are not everything they needed to be to fully flesh out these elegant immortals.Read the full review

Washington Post | Desson ThomsonAdd Critic to Favorites

Unfortunately, the story, adapted by Anne Rice from her best-selling novel, sucks at the neck a little too long. A 23-minute snipping from this 123-minute movie would have done wonders.Read the full review

Los Angeles Times | Kenneth TuranAdd Critic to Favorites

Although he works his hardest at the part and doesn't embarrass himself, even with the help of Stan Winston's vampire makeup Tom Cruise is plainly miscast as Lestat. [11Nov1994 Pg. F1]Read the full review

Entertainment Weekly | Owen GleibermanAdd Critic to Favorites

Dramatically, though, the film is torpid.Read the full review

Washington Post | Rita KempleyAdd Critic to Favorites

Passionately anticipated and much ballyhooed, the film, alas, is little more than a foppish, fang de siecle costume drama. Its pulse barely registers.Read the full review

Track Your Favorite Critics | Start Now