Leatherheads User Reviews
Average Rating:
Most Recent
- |
- Username
Worst movie made in years. Clooney was horrible in this. He was a waiter before he made it big in Hollywood, so I guess that makes him a political genius. Anyway he's a good actor, but he was horrid in this.
05/22/2008, 9:28 am
Going in descending order -Great - Cinematography, music, John Krasinski playing a lovable sell-out (all those posters!)Good - George Clooney's Dodge is scruffy, funny, and amazingly enough, knows when to leave the party.Okay - Renee Zellweger, who was robbed of her Oscar for playing a 20's moll in CHICAGO, is frustrating because Leatherheads is set in the 20's and she is not delivering. There's no kick, no vinegar to her woman-in-a-man's-world reporter. And who dressed her? Aside from 2 hats, her wardrobe was at least 20 years ahead of the time.Annoying - the sepia pics bookcasing every other scene. The cop chase was not only filler, but boring filler. They could have at least speed-motioned it with tinkly piano music to get a laugh. Also, everybody seemed just out of reach of each other. The whole movie felt like George Clooney had a dream he made a football movie.
05/22/2008, 9:28 am
Sorry, but this movie just bored me to death. I couldn't quite get what the big deal was with the mian plot. Zellweger ; way over acts and Clooney is practically kissing the lens. Sorry .... total bomb fest .. 1 out of 5 stars. thanks
05/22/2008, 9:28 am
This movie was quite boring to me. I understood everything that was going on just fine, it was just an extremely slow moving storyline. Thats really the only thing I can say. It was good, and decent, but not the best movie i've ever seen.
05/22/2008, 9:28 am
A real snooze. Poorly acted. I left in the middle of the movie. I just could not take any more.
05/22/2008, 9:28 am
I go to the movies about 8 or 9 times a months this movie was a big disapointment, the kind of movie that makes you want to ask for your money back,dull,dull,dull.
05/22/2008, 9:28 am
In order to understand this movie you need to be a senior and have lived in the USA during the time period this movie was set in. Then you'll really enjoy it. For people under 50, most likely you just won't get it and the ideal viewer should be in the 60-90 year old range and be alert of mind. Then you'll really enjoy a flashback to earlier years. I would give this about 3 out of 4 stars as it wasn't perfect by any means.
05/22/2008, 9:28 am
i did not see this movie becouse of what all you little sniveling jerk offs said about this movie. this make number 7 thats seven movies that i skiped all becouse of this stuped review site, thanks for taking the suprise out of life...the easter bunny is not REAL !!!! nor is santa =!!! frickin buzz kill A@@
05/22/2008, 9:28 am
The Movie was funny and good, but yet...i'm only 14. I understood what somethings in the movie were like speakeasies from history class, but overall, it was confusing to me.
05/22/2008, 9:28 am
We were so looking forward to this movie, but I have to admit I was bored and fell asleep. It had a few cute moments, but on the whole, I wish I had my time and money back.
05/22/2008, 9:28 am