Mad Love (1935) Critic Reviews

Metascore®:

62 =
Based upon 7 Critic Reviews
See all Mad Love (1935) reviews at
Sorted by:
San Francisco Chronicle | Mick LaSalleAdd Critic to Favorites

Sexy, peculiar and always entertaining.Read the full review

Los Angeles Times | Kenneth TuranAdd Critic to Favorites

Succeeds as a full-bodied diversion because it takes even its silly elements seriously. If you're in the mood for impressive castles and sumptuous costumes, torch-lit processions and decorative nudity, this is the place to turn.Read the full review

Washington Post | Michael O'SullivanAdd Critic to Favorites

A bodice-ripper for intellectuals.Read the full review

The New York Times | A.O. ScottAdd Critic to Favorites

An often watchable, though goofy and lurid, blast of a costume drama set in the late 15th century.Read the full review

The Onion (A.V. Club) | Nathan RabinAdd Critic to Favorites

At heart it's a randy, oversexed soap opera in period garb.Read the full review

Wall Street Journal | Collin LeveyAdd Critic to Favorites

Despite being a pretty film with some good performances, it's hard to sympathize with a character that won't help herself. More proof, if we need it, that mixing sex and politics only leads to trouble.Read the full review

Boston Globe | Wesley MorrisAdd Critic to Favorites

Like an ''Afterschool Special'' with costumes by Gianni Versace, Mad Love looks better than it feels.Read the full review

Track Your Favorite Critics | Start Now