Michael Collins Critic Reviews

Metascore®:

73 =
Based upon 10 Critic Reviews
See all Michael Collins reviews at
Sorted by:
The Onion (A.V. Club) | John KrewsonAdd Critic to Favorites

Liam Neeson's performance as Collins is at once stirring and blood-curdling, as befits the role of a man who murdered for a cause he believed was just, but was willing to stop when he believed his objective was reached.Read the full review

Los Angeles Times | Kenneth TuranAdd Critic to Favorites

This is an extremely cinematic, beautifully made David Lean-type epic, helped by fluid and involving camera work by two-time Oscar-winning ("The Killing Fields," "The Mission") cinematographer Chris Menges.Read the full review

ReelViews | James BerardinelliAdd Critic to Favorites

Putting aside all the controversy, however, viewers are left with an expertly-directed and well-acted historical epic that disappoints only in its shallow perspective of the Irish/British and Irish/Irish conflicts.Read the full review

Entertainment Weekly | Ken TuckerAdd Critic to Favorites

For whatever reason, Michael Collins is a troublesome movie, a film about a religious war in which religion is almost entirely absent; a flick that gives us our kicks with thrillingly shot terroristic violence while paying lip service to pious antiviolence sentiments.Read the full review

Chicago Sun-Times | Roger EbertAdd Critic to Favorites

The movie moves confidently when it focuses on Collins and his best friend and co-strategist Harry Boland (Aidan Quinn). But it falters with the unnecessary character of Kitty Kiernan (Julia Roberts), who is in love with both men, and they with her.Read the full review

Washington Post | Desson ThomsonAdd Critic to Favorites

In old-fashioned movie terms, it's enjoyable, thanks mostly to Neeson who, not unlike Jeff Bridges, always eclipses your expectations of him. [25 Oct 1996, Pg.N.42]Read the full review

The New York Times | Elvis MitchellAdd Critic to Favorites

The film itself works eagerly to emphasize the frankly entertaining aspects of its story.Read the full review

Variety | Todd McCarthyAdd Critic to Favorites

It is unfortunate when such a difficult, ambitious film doesn't quite pay off after building up so much solid credit, but that is the case here. It is possible that the nature of the history under consideration is as responsible for this as any other single factor.Read the full review

USA Today | Mike ClarkAdd Critic to Favorites

It isn't an unabashed movie-movie like the chest-thumping "Braveheart" or a cool, clinical semi-documentary like "The Battle of Algiers". There are elements of both here and they just don't dance. [11 Oct 1996, Pg.03.D]Read the full review

San Francisco Chronicle | Peter StackAdd Critic to Favorites

Viewers may feel let down because the depth promised by the movie's visual artistry is never quite delivered.Read the full review

Track Your Favorite Critics | Start Now