Pathfinder User Reviews
Average Rating:
Most Recent
- |
- Username
I think this movie was great. I came across this movie one night desperatley searching Comcast's guide for a movie; I need to escape my husband's game. I started watching this with it being half thru it still had me glued to the seat. I gave it 5 stars. I have orderied the movie from Amazon.
11/23/2008, 12:04 pm
The Figths were realy good but the story was lacking would not suggest this movie to my friends or anyone else
05/22/2008, 11:01 am
I thought it was a great movie it kept me on the edge of my seat the whole time!!!!
05/22/2008, 11:01 am
This was one of the worst movies I've seen in a while. The previews were rather deceiving.
05/22/2008, 11:01 am
I read the reviews before I saw this flick. I strongly agree with the comment that the film is shot in the dark. I guess that is the effect the artist wanted. Hard for me to see what was going on in some cases.The plot was very good... and it kept my wife and I interested throughout the movie. Worthwhile seeing for sure.
05/22/2008, 11:01 am
The movie was terribly disjointed, and barely any story line. It was if children wrote the screenplay,...[he's running away, now he's fighting, now he's in a cave and they are surrounding him....] If anybody suggests this film, they are on the payroll to promote it.
05/22/2008, 11:01 am
Movie was great adventure. It was short on words, but that made it great. Almost like you were on a long fun ride the whole time.
05/22/2008, 11:01 am
The resounding thought I have regarding this film, is my curiosity to know who the target audience is. It's a movie about Viking barbarians and natives, with plenty of gore and retread hero-coming-of-age moments, yet I just couldn't get into it. It wasn't tangible. Seemingly based purely on fiction, there were no characters I could get inspired about from history books past. Maybe it was based on a novel, dunno, but not a novel that has ever come across my radar screen. WIth the prevalence of fantasy novels coming to life in the theater, this movie had no chance. The acting was fine, the fight scenes were par, the gore was unique and worthy of an A, yet I think I just wasted my time; couldn't connect or identify with the main character.
05/22/2008, 11:01 am
The cinematography represents the best and worst of this movie. It is very "dark." That's a good thing. But the scenery is clearly, entirely inappropriate for a movie which is supposed to take place on the Eastern coast of the North American Continent. This movie looks like it was filmed in the Pacific Northwest. If you've seen "Apocalypto" or "The New World" you've seen this (lesser) movie. Only the bad guys are different.
05/22/2008, 11:01 am
This reviewer named Stephen Hunter, from the Washington Post just doesn't get it folks! He gave the movie a 20 out of 100??!! Come on people....don't listen to him or the other critics on this one! Believe me...this is a very thoughtful movie with great cinematography, beautiful visuals and fine performances across the board. This critic put the film down for being low on dialogue....since when is that such a bad thing I might ask? Movies are a visual medium, first and foremost....so what if the dialogue is less! The dialogue there was worked fine, and the actors gave strong physical and facial acting across the board. I HIGHLY suggest this film....it is an A in my book.
05/22/2008, 11:01 am
