Peter Pan (2003) Critic Reviews
Metascore®:
Based upon 15 Critic Reviews- Highest Rated
- |
Publications (A-Z)
- |
- Critics (A-Z)
- |
- Favorite Critics
All Peter Pan lacks is a Peter Pan with any discernible personality, no matter that Jeremy Sumpter is the first actual, genetic boy to play the role on film.Read the full review
tT never grow up is unspeakably sad, and this is the first Peter Pan where Peter's final flight seems not like a victory but an escape.Read the full review
A bright, whirling pinwheel of a movie that tosses around special effects like confetti, but the techno magic is graced with a touch of sensuality.Read the full review
Though being magical is very much its intention, it never manages to cross the threshold that makes that happen in our hearts.Read the full review
Unlike last year's disastrous "Pinocchio" with Roberto Benigni, this movie proves worth the time, effort, and money to get the whole family to a theater.Read the full review
Despite a hint that Peter (Jeremy Sumpter) and Wendy (Rachel Hurd-Wood) might get it on, there's nothing to crow about.Read the full review
A dazzling retelling of the J.M. Barrie tale, offers accomplished acting, splendid visuals, and in the role of the boy who won't grow up ... an actual boy.Read the full review
The film suffers from uneven acting, an over-reliance on production values and an uncertainty over how dangerous the children's adventures should be.Read the full review
Mr. Hogan understands both themes, and his filmmaking style is a perfect mixture of wide-eyed wonder and slightly melancholy sophistication.Read the full review
It's tacky and beautiful, sometimes both at the same time. Occasionally flatfooted even as it sparkles, the film suffers when Hogan lets the scenery do the directing for him, but he's chosen a cast capable of shouldering the film's weight.Read the full review
