Very good action scenes! I had no idea what ws going on in the movie half the time, but if you just want entertainment and action this would be your movie. I've never seen Daniel Craig as James Bond before, but he has a sense of confidence that we as an audience can believe.

11/27/2008, 7:53 pm

OK.

11/27/2008, 1:58 pm

The movie was ok. There was only action scenes. There was no story and no cool cars or gadgets. This didnt feel like James Bond at all. The action scenes were cool though.

11/27/2008, 1:30 am

This movie was very good! Unfortunately I'm seeing the same complaints about this movie as I did about how Batman Begins and The Dark Knight movies which were nothing like the Michael Keaten and previous batman films, in that the new ones had a lot of action but didn't have the gadgets and the elaborate (unrealistic) scenes as the "classic" films did. This is a NEW era of Bond movies, just like there is a NEW era of Batman movies. Get over it. Casino Royale starring Daniel Craig, marked a NEW chapter in Bond history and direction. The two new installments of 007 movies depict a much more realistic bond with real feelings and real emotions. It also depicts a Bond with much more realistic weapons and gadgets. Sorry to burst your fantasies of a Inspector Gadget old-style Bond movie, but this is what the new phase of Bond movies are. I thought it was a well-acted, well-edited, and well put-together movie. I personally liked Casino Royale better, but this movie is definitely worth seeing and IS a good movie.

11/26/2008, 11:36 am

It wasn't THAT bad guys...late in the year for a Popcorn-bang-bang flick, but it had alot to live up to. I thought Casino Royale would really rejuvenate the series, and D. Craig is very believable as Bond. He just has that"relentless, to the death" feel about his Bond. Crappy title song(Casino's ROCKED), and lack of a stromg Bond girl was lame, but good screen duos with "M". You can see why he is her favorite "prodigal son". The original working title(By All Means Necessary) would have been better than the enigma of "Quantum of Solice"...sounds like your going to see an Asimov Sci-fi Flick really.....Great opening scene too. All in all, not bad, but a disapointment when put against Casino Royale. Even Saen Connery had a few "clunkers" in the series.

11/25/2008, 5:59 pm

I was looking forward all weekend to see the latest BOND movie, and was completely disappointed. There was no BOND music, no BOND gadgets, and no BOND interesting plot lines. It was just another action movie, but a terrible one at that.

11/23/2008, 10:58 pm

Not only was this the worst Bond movie ever, it was a bad movie. Bond fans stay away!!!!! Painful to watch, you don't care what happens to anyone in this movie. NO Q, !!!!!!!!!!!!

11/23/2008, 7:28 pm

casino royal was great this was tourture! i wanted to leave but somehing in my head said it was going to get better. but nope the good part never came. terible movie and very hard to fallow. if i had to see this again i would kill myself! im not kidding. for god sakes dont see it!

11/23/2008, 12:23 pm

Quantum of Solace, the latest in the long running British franchise, has more the feel of a typical action movie like the Transporter films that classic Bond. James Bond (Daniel Craig) is more of a rough and tumble street fighter than the suave figure of Bond’s past. See my full review at johnhuntspace.com/quantumofsolace.html

11/23/2008, 12:21 pm