Quick Change (2003) Critic Reviews

Metascore®:

53 =
Based upon 12 Critic Reviews
See all Quick Change (2003) reviews at
Sorted by:
Los Angeles Times | Sheila BensonAdd Critic to Favorites

The comedy of Quick Change is city-dweller humor, honed to a fine edge and site-specific to New York because the Big Apple is more or less on its knees, civility-wise. All it needs is a lethally funny comedy like this to give it the coup de grace. [13 Jul 1990, p.1]Read the full review

Chicago Sun-Times | Roger EbertAdd Critic to Favorites

Quick Change is a funny but not an inspired comedy. It has two directors - Howard Franklin and Bill Murray - and I wonder if that has anything to do with its inability to be more than just efficiently entertaining.Read the full review

San Francisco Chronicle | Richard NataleAdd Critic to Favorites

What's surprising about Quick Change, particularly in light of his more recent mega-budget efforts, is its witty affability. [15 Jul 1990, p.34]Read the full review

Variety | Staff (Not Credited)Add Critic to Favorites

Bill Murray delivers a smart, sardonic and very funny valentine to the rotten Apple in Quick Change. Pic became Murray's directing debut after he and Franklin became too attached to the project to bring anyone else in. Material, based on Jay Cronley's book, is neither ambitious nor particularly memorable, but it's brought off with a sly flair that makes it most enjoyable.Read the full review

Washington Post | Rita KempleyAdd Critic to Favorites

Behind the lens Murray has an uneven touch (or perhaps his co-director does), and "Quick Change" is given to slow moments and miscalculations. But in front of the camera, he is as wonderfully acerbic as ever, equal parts anger and hurt feelings as he grapples with the rot of the Apple, the roar of subway, the smell of the crowds.Read the full review

Entertainment Weekly | Owen GleibermanAdd Critic to Favorites

Quick Change starts out fast and loose — it gets the audience primed for a ripsnorting caper comedy. Yet almost nothing that follows is as clever, as surprising, or as casually anarchic as that nifty opening sequence. Murray himself served as codirector, and though he doesn't do anything terribly wrong, the movie lacks comic zest.Read the full review

Boston Globe | Jay CarrAdd Critic to Favorites

As a performer, Murray moves through the film with a lovely doomed aplomb. And his quick verbal wit is almost enough to pull Quick Change off. But as a director, his inexperience costs him. His camera isn't as quick as his tongue. [13 Jul 1990, p.29]Read the full review

Washington Post | Desson HoweAdd Critic to Favorites

As a screenplay -- as a story -- Change is a silly mess. Its direction is also perfunctory, a bland rendition of the usual chain of Hollywood events. But the main reason to watch Change is for Murray, of course. And no matter what formulaic claptrap is around him, he always redeems it with something comic.Read the full review

USA Today | Susan WloszczynaAdd Critic to Favorites

Don't look for any belly laughs, but Quick Change will help you put on a happy face. [13 Jul 1990, p. 4D]Read the full review

Wall Street Journal | Julie SalamonAdd Critic to Favorites

Mr. Murray and his co-director, Howard Franklin, who adapted Jay Cronley's novel for the screen, succeed mainly in illuminating what made them want to direct the material. At least this picture struggles to emit a few gasps of fresh air as it goes down. [19 Jul 1990, p.A8]Read the full review

Track Your Favorite Critics | Start Now