Scent of a Woman Critic Reviews

Metascore®:

67 =
Based upon 9 Critic Reviews
See all Scent of a Woman reviews at
Sorted by:
Los Angeles Times | Peter RainerAdd Critic to Favorites

But it's essentially a tour de force for Pacino, and he sustains us through the slow passages by working with a closed-in intensity that turns each scene into a kind of mini-movie complete with its own ticking time bomb. [23Dec1992 Pg. 1]Read the full review

The New York Times | Elvis MitchellAdd Critic to Favorites

The good thing is that the principals and film makers make the absolute most of a conventional opportunity.Read the full review

Chicago Sun-Times | Roger EbertAdd Critic to Favorites

By the end of Scent of a Woman, we have arrived at the usual conclusion of the coming-of-age movie, and the usual conclusion of the prep school movie. But rarely have we been taken there with so much intelligence and skill.Read the full review

Entertainment Weekly | Owen GleibermanAdd Critic to Favorites

In the end, Scent of a Woman offers little more than lumbering simulation of Rain Man's nimble magic. But Pacino's performance-scabrous, tender, ripely theatrical-is a master showman's trick.Read the full review

ReelViews | James BerardinelliAdd Critic to Favorites

If there's anything special about the film, it's that on this occasion, the emotional realism of the characters, especially Slade, is heartwrenchingly believable.Read the full review

Washington Post | Hal HinsonAdd Critic to Favorites

This is a great performance from Pacino, who has the good luck here to work with Goldman's mostly wonderful, edgy script, but it might not become a beloved one because the man he plays is such a bitter pill.Read the full review

Washington Post | Desson ThomsonAdd Critic to Favorites

In the end, however, when all Pacino's demons are bared, they don't add up to the poignant punchline you were set up for. The movie seems to have two or three finales too many -- a disturbing trend in all too many films of late.Read the full review

USA Today | Mike ClarkAdd Critic to Favorites

A 2 1/2-hour movie with halves that don't quite mesh, it still gives Al Pacino a role that's a perfect fit. [23 Dec 1992 Pg. 01.D]Read the full review

Rolling Stone | Peter TraversAdd Critic to Favorites

The movie, however, is a crock.Read the full review

Track Your Favorite Critics | Start Now