Shorts User Reviews

Average Rating:

Sorted by:
Hiphopgaljuju

Omg what a terrible movie i would rather see 5 hour boring silent movie 20x100000000000000000000000.terrible never see it.... like seroiusly if u go c this movie u will regret it forevr!!!! They are the worst actors in the history of horrible actorrs!!! no joke!!!

09/19/2009, 6:08 pm

Rafael Singer

shorts was so funny because warner bros pictures media rights capital imagenation abu dhabi and troublemaker studios should amke a sequel called "Shorts 2: Comeback Of The Wishing Rock:

09/09/2009, 7:14 am

SOLARLIVIN

They called this movie Shorts because it is sooo SHORT, the plot only begins to interest you when its over. I could hear kids around us saying, is it over, was that it. Too hard for little kids to follow. Go if it is cheap but save your real bugdet for something better, maybe G Force.

09/04/2009, 12:45 pm

BEE879

went to the drive in to see the movie it was a waste of our time. Someone directed that movie badly. Dont waste your movie at least it was only 3.50 at the drive in.grandkids could not wait to see the next movie aliens in the attic that was far better that shorts

08/24/2009, 5:30 am

luvmovies552

Horrible movie. I wish I would have read these reviews before I threw $50 bucks down the toliet (which is how I felt after this flick). I really could say it was almost the worst movie I have every seen. Certainly the worst family movie. Not even worth a star.

08/23/2009, 4:05 pm

WinterPro

Why is this movie given a 4 star user rating?

08/23/2009, 2:00 pm

jffrywad

terrible... with kids i see alot of "kids" movies and I generally like them. This was so bad even my 3 year old wanted to go home. The 7 year old liked it but even she didnt talk about it too much after. The format and the way it was edited made it very hard to watch. Skip it till it comes out on DVD in like a week.

08/22/2009, 11:19 pm

Aewrealtor

I took my four grandchildren yesterday ... what a waste of money ... the only one that even REMOTELY enjoyed it was the 7 year old (other ages 9,10 and 12) ... and she only gave it a "3". The others' votes were in the "minus" category ...

08/22/2009, 4:02 pm

WhitePearl925464

IT WAS A HORRIBLE MOVIE RIGHT FROM THE BEGINNING!WAY TOO SLOW MOVING UNTIL ALMOST MIDWAY THRU. THE CASTING WAS AWFUL WITH THE EXCEPTION OF WILLIAM H. MACY AND JAMES SPADER. THE GIRL BULLY, PLAYED BY JOLIE VANIER,SHOULD HAVE BEEN A MISCARRIAGE. THE CHARACTER AND THE ATTITUDE STUNK.SO DID MOST OF THE PLOT AND ACTING. I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE CRITICS GAVE IT THREE STARS.I WANT MY MONEY BACK!!

08/21/2009, 5:05 pm

Results 1 - 10 of 12
Add a Review
Enter Your Rating
  • 3000 Characters Maximum
    Please note that you must be signed in to rate or review a movie