Showgirls Critic Reviews

Metascore®:

26 =
Based upon 10 Critic Reviews
See all Showgirls reviews at
Sorted by:
USA Today | Susan WloszczynaAdd Critic to Favorites

Who knew such a seamy swim in the misogynistic swill of life could be so entertaining?Read the full review

Entertainment Weekly | Owen GleibermanAdd Critic to Favorites

As Nomi, Elizabeth Berkley has exactly two emotions -- hot and bothered -- but her party-doll blowsiness works for the picture.Read the full review

Chicago Sun-Times | Roger EbertAdd Critic to Favorites

If the plot and screenplay are juvenile, the production values are first-rate, and the lead performance by newcomer Elizabeth Berkley has a fierce energy that's always interesting.Read the full review

Washington Post | Desson ThomsonAdd Critic to Favorites

To take Showgirls that seriously (as either trash-art or appalling pornography) wouldn't be worth the exertion.Read the full review

San Francisco Chronicle | Mick LaSalleAdd Critic to Favorites

What's completely baffling is that everyone in the film thinks Nomi is one heck of a dancer, even though her one move -- throwing her arms out stiffly -- is straight out of "Dr. Strangelove."Read the full review

Washington Post | Rita KempleyAdd Critic to Favorites

This film is just a coarser, dumber, smuttier remake of the 1983 Eszterhas-penned "Flashdance," throbbing music, working-class Cinderella and all.Read the full review

ReelViews | James BerardinelliAdd Critic to Favorites

This film is like a shiny, red apple that's rotten to the core -- despite slick direction and a glossy sheen, it reeks of decay. Showgirls isn't a good drama, a good thriller, or even good pornography.Read the full review

Los Angeles Times | Kenneth TuranAdd Critic to Favorites

Lacking the combustible Sharon Stone and Michael Douglas in leading roles, Showgirls descends into incoherent tedium. Though the filmmakers' incessant talk about vision, artistry and honest self-expression lead one to expect a sexually explicit biopic about the Dalai Lama, what is in fact provided is depressing and disappointing as well as dehumanizing.Read the full review

Variety | Todd McCarthyAdd Critic to Favorites

Impossibly vulgar, tawdry and coarse, this much-touted major studio splash into NC-17 waters is akin to being keelhauled through a cesspool, with sharks swimming alongside.Read the full review

The New York Times | Elvis MitchellAdd Critic to Favorites

The film makers had declared they were bravely exploring new levels of licentiousness, but the biggest risk they've taken here is making a nearly $40 million movie without anyone who can act. The absence of both drama and eroticism turns Showgirls into a bare-butted bore. [22 Sept 1995]Read the full review

Track Your Favorite Critics | Start Now