Spider-Man 3 Critic Reviews

Metascore®:

58 =
Based upon 15 Critic Reviews
See all Spider-Man 3 reviews at
Sorted by:
Boston Globe | Wesley MorrisAdd Critic to Favorites

Raimi, who shares script credit with his brother Ivan and Alvin Sargent, strikes an exquisite balance between pop and woe, drama and whooshing adventure.Read the full review

Chicago Sun-Times | Roger EbertAdd Critic to Favorites

Spider-Man 3 is, in short, a mess. Too many villains, too many pale plot strands, too many romantic misunderstandings, too many conversations, too many street crowds looking high into the air and shouting "oooh!" this way, then swiveling and shouting "aaah!" that way.Read the full review

Entertainment Weekly | Owen GleibermanAdd Critic to Favorites

Spider-Man 3 has terrific moments, but after the danger and majesty and romantic brio of "Spider-Man 2," those adrenalized rooftop ballets feel, more than ever, like sequences.Read the full review

Los Angeles Times | Kenneth TuranAdd Critic to Favorites

Though aspects of it are entertaining, the presence of all these mismatched pieces give Spider-Man 3 an ungainly, cumbersome feeling, as if its plot elements were the product of competing contractors who never saw the need to cooperate on a coherent final product.Read the full review

ReelViews | James BerardinelliAdd Critic to Favorites

Spider-Man and the first sequel were breezy adventures - easy and fun to sit through. Spider-Man 3 is a chore. The effective moments require a lot patience to uncover and some of what has to be shifted to get to them is not worth the effort. People love trilogies because it's said that good things come in threes, but this series would have looked better and felt more satisfying had the filmmakers stopped at two.Read the full review

Rolling Stone | Peter TraversAdd Critic to Favorites

There are delicious bits aplenty in Spider-Man 3 for those who care to notice.Read the full review

San Francisco Chronicle | Mick LaSalleAdd Critic to Favorites

"Spider-Man 2" was a textbook example of how to make a sequel: Deepen it, make it funnier, give it more heart and come up with a strong villain and a good story. Spider Man 3, by contrast, shows how not to make a sequel.Read the full review

Slate | Dana StevensAdd Critic to Favorites

There are plenty of pleasures here: The slow birth of the Sandman from a heap of supercharged sand crystals (or something) is a marvel of digital animation, and the chemistry between Dunst and Maguire feels like the dynamic of a real couple, full of subtle shifts and eloquent silences.Read the full review

The Hollywood Reporter | Michael RechtshaffenAdd Critic to Favorites

The wow factor works overtime with state-of-the-art effects sequences that often are as beautiful as they are astonishing.Read the full review

The New York Times | Manohla DargisAdd Critic to Favorites

The bittersweet paradox of this franchise is that while the stories have grown progressively less interesting the special effects have improved tremendously, becoming at once more plausible -- when Spider-Man swings through the urban canyons he finally looks almost real -- and more spectacular.Read the full review

Track Your Favorite Critics | Start Now