Stuart Little 2 Critic Reviews

Metascore®:

71 =
Based upon 13 Critic Reviews
See all Stuart Little 2 reviews at
Sorted by:
Washington Post | Ann HornadayAdd Critic to Favorites

A wonderful thing to snuggle into, as full of heart and pep and innocence as the title character himself.Read the full review

Variety | Joe LeydonAdd Critic to Favorites

Slight but lively sequel. Aimed squarely at moppets with piddling attention spans.Read the full review

Los Angeles Times | Kenneth TuranAdd Critic to Favorites

Like many modern children's films, Stuart Little 2 can't decide between teaching good values ("You're only as big as you feel") and tossing out fake-hip jokes. Though it doesn't happen as often as it should, this is a better film when it allows itself simply to be sweet.Read the full review

Washington Post | Desson ThomsonAdd Critic to Favorites

It's a pleasant experience. But that's what it is: a sequel that replays every aspect of the original movie.Read the full review

The New York Times | Stephen HoldenAdd Critic to Favorites

What sets the "Stuart Little" franchise above most of the competition is its emphasis on sharply drawn character and its profusion of witty remarks (mostly from the mouth of Snowbell) that are cutting enough to amuse grown-ups without sailing over children's heads.Read the full review

Chicago Sun-Times | Roger EbertAdd Critic to Favorites

Of the voices, Griffith makes Margalo lovable and as sexy as a little yellow bird can be, and Lane does a virtuoso job with Snowbell, the only cat with dialogue by Damon Runyon. Fox's Stuart is stalwart and heroic--the Braveheart of mice. As for the parents, Davis and Laurie deserve some kind of award for keeping straight faces.Read the full review

San Francisco Chronicle | Mick LaSalleAdd Critic to Favorites

May hit a few wrong notes, but it strikes an emotional chord.Read the full review

Entertainment Weekly | Owen GleibermanAdd Critic to Favorites

Very much a kiddie ride, Stuart Little 2 is lively without being hyperactive -- it's a bouncy mouse caper with a wee bit of soul.Read the full review

ReelViews | James BerardinelliAdd Critic to Favorites

May be the best family movie of the 2002 summer film-going season. There's a simple reason for this - the picture seems to have been put together with the recognition that some members of the audience may be above the age of ten.Read the full review

Wall Street Journal | Joe MorgensternAdd Critic to Favorites

It's hard to imagine spending $120 million on a film starring a computer-generated mouse -- an actor who barely demands a byte to eat -- but if that's how much it takes to provide innocent enchantment for the global hordes, so be it. This sequel beats the original paws down.Read the full review

Track Your Favorite Critics | Start Now