UHF Critic Reviews

Metascore®:

38 =
Based upon 7 Critic Reviews
See all UHF reviews at
Sorted by:
The New York Times | Stephen HoldenAdd Critic to Favorites

The movie is forever digressing so that Mr. Yankovic can offer media spoofs that have only the most tangential relation to the story. [22 Jul 1989, p.1.15]Read the full review

Washington Post | Rita KempleyAdd Critic to Favorites

Yankovic, an advocate of the Monty Python and Mel Brooks schools of comedy, favors yechy burlesque, and UHF, with its scant plot, is basically a variety show with skits, sight gags and gross stuff. "Weird" reminds us there's nothing quite like a good booger joke for pure entertainment.Read the full review

Washington Post | Desson HoweAdd Critic to Favorites

UHF is not a uniformly funny experience, unless you have to wear a bib and tend to laugh at anything, such as sudden gusts of wind. Yankovic, co-writing with manager Jay Levey (who also directed), goes for gag after gag. Some hit, some miss. You laugh, you cry.Read the full review

Wall Street Journal | Julie SalamonAdd Critic to Favorites

UHF, a parody of trash television, is almost defiantly silly, but when it's funny it is very funny. This sloppy, good-natured satire certainly doesn't threaten "Network's" status as the classic decimation of the television business. [27 Jul 1989, p.1]Read the full review

Chicago Sun-Times | Roger EbertAdd Critic to Favorites

The result is a very unfunny movie. It's routine, predictable, and dumb - real dumb.Read the full review

Los Angeles Times | Michael WilmingtonAdd Critic to Favorites

The problem with UHF is that everything in it is a parody. The only logic for anything that happens is that there's some new thing to make fun of-mostly inanely. It's not much of a movie. [21 Jul 1989 p.11]Read the full review

San Francisco Chronicle | Mick LaSalleAdd Critic to Favorites

In UHF we get 90 minutes of Al Yankovic, and that's 85 minutes too much. The problem isn't that he's weird, but that he isn't weird at all. The premises for his gags are commonplace and predictable, and his follow-throughs lack imagination. He seems incapable of spinning more than one tired joke from each set-up. [21 Jul 1989, p.E1]Read the full review

Track Your Favorite Critics | Start Now