Unforgiven (1992) Critic Reviews
Metascore®:
Based upon 10 Critic ReviewsHighest Rated
- |
- Publications (A-Z)
- |
- Critics (A-Z)
- |
- Favorite Critics
It's powerful entertainment. [22 Sept 1992, p.A16(E)]Read the full review
Simultaneously heroic and nihilistic, reeking of myth but modern as they come, it is a Western for those who know and chrish the form, a film that resonates with the spirit of films past while staking out a territory quite its own. [7 Aug 1992]Read the full review
Clint Eastwood has crafted a tense, hard-edged, superbly dramatic yarn that is also an exceedingly intelligent meditation on the West, its myths and its heroes.Read the full review
Unforgiven is the most provocative western of Eastwood's career, and with Gene Hackman, Morgan Freeman and Richard Harris along for the ride, it's also the most potently acted.Read the full review
Exults in the hard-riding romanticism of classic Westerns, but it takes revisionist stock too. It dismounts at places usually left in the dust -- the oppressed lot of women, the loneliness of untended children, adult illiteracy and the horrible last moments of the dying.Read the full review
It's the actor/director's best movie - and the best Western by anybody in over 20 years. [7 Aug 1992]Read the full review
Unforgiven... never quite fulfills the expectations it so carefully sets up. It doesn't exactly deny them, but the bloody confrontations that end the film appear to be purposely muted, more effective theoretically than dramatically.Read the full review
As enjoyable as most of Unforgiven is, Eastwood's shades-of-gray moralism feels like a whitewash.Read the full review
Though the movie is riddled with memorable scenes of violence, its pace is slow -- too slow. It has an epic sprawl, but it's not an epic. It's more like a bloated fairy tale. [7 Aug 1992]Read the full review
If Eastwood had any emotional depth as an actor, the character's anguish might come through.Read the full review