Report This!
FFJJackson
make that "snore-fest".
07/19/2009, 12:47 am
Report This!
FFJJackson
It should have been named "Harry Potter and the 156 Minutes of Your Life You'll Never Get Back". What a nore-fest. By far, the worst one which makes the prospect of 2 more Potter films pretty grim.
07/19/2009, 12:47 am
Report This!
Ladycate27
i thought the beginning and ending were very disappointing, and I hope the director of the next episode does a better job on special effects and character development. The first movie was by far the best
07/18/2009, 9:27 pm
Report This!
Mugglegal70
I liked the movie overall, but I was disapointed in the end. I don't like the fact that they left Dumbledore's funeral out completely! He is a major character in the book and the end was beautifully written. It was a shame it was left out. I hope on the seventh movie they'll maybe have a flashback of the end of the sixth. Who knows?
07/18/2009, 9:06 pm
Report This!
ilbbriefer
Too long with a lazy story line. If we want teenage angst, we'll watch Twilight. The decision to waste all that time on teenage love and minimize the horcrux story and uneventful funeral at the end made this a major disappointment.
07/18/2009, 8:46 pm
Report This!
Crcmoon4
I agree that there was a lot of good content from the book in the movie but, I wish they had had the fight scene at the end. It would have made the movie the best yet. I also wish they had shown the funeral.
07/18/2009, 8:44 pm
Report This!
iM frUm nY Ny
in all honest, im probably the biggest harry potter book fan iv ever met in my entire life. I thought the movie was really good, i was dissapointed that it missed alot of big details and scenes that should have been there but the movie was done well and it was interesting and excited. I hope the deathly hallows is done as well but with much much more detail.
07/18/2009, 6:02 pm
Report This!
Asoccerfreak30
I saw the movie last night and thought it was one of the best ones, even though they didnt have a lot of the details from the book. i was dissappointed that they didnt have scenes like the funeral for Dumbledore, etc. the movie also seemed to focus more on the teenage relationships than the action. it also didnt seemed rushed like the 5th one did. obviously the book is much better than the movie but i still think the movie is worth seeing.
07/18/2009, 5:26 pm
Report This!
Aracelimad3
So it is that bad? I have to see it to believe it ? I have to talk to one of my cousins and if it was good or not ? I can't belive the years has passed it feels like yesterday when they did the first harry potter movie? I can't believe he is gay?
07/18/2009, 5:17 pm
Report This!
starvingforwerds
MOST MOVIES ARE NOT ALWAYS JUST LIKE THE BOOKS> YOu people are completely naive, i say! How is a 600 some page book going to be made into a movie? It would have been two parts if it could fit everything. It was an interpretation. Live and learn.
07/18/2009, 5:09 pm
Add a Comment
User comments
Add a commentmake that "snore-fest".
07/19/2009, 12:47 am
It should have been named "Harry Potter and the 156 Minutes of Your Life You'll Never Get Back". What a nore-fest. By far, the worst one which makes the prospect of 2 more Potter films pretty grim.
07/19/2009, 12:47 am
i thought the beginning and ending were very disappointing, and I hope the director of the next episode does a better job on special effects and character development. The first movie was by far the best
07/18/2009, 9:27 pm
I liked the movie overall, but I was disapointed in the end. I don't like the fact that they left Dumbledore's funeral out completely! He is a major character in the book and the end was beautifully written. It was a shame it was left out. I hope on the seventh movie they'll maybe have a flashback of the end of the sixth. Who knows?
07/18/2009, 9:06 pm
Too long with a lazy story line. If we want teenage angst, we'll watch Twilight. The decision to waste all that time on teenage love and minimize the horcrux story and uneventful funeral at the end made this a major disappointment.
07/18/2009, 8:46 pm
I agree that there was a lot of good content from the book in the movie but, I wish they had had the fight scene at the end. It would have made the movie the best yet. I also wish they had shown the funeral.
07/18/2009, 8:44 pm
in all honest, im probably the biggest harry potter book fan iv ever met in my entire life. I thought the movie was really good, i was dissapointed that it missed alot of big details and scenes that should have been there but the movie was done well and it was interesting and excited. I hope the deathly hallows is done as well but with much much more detail.
07/18/2009, 6:02 pm
I saw the movie last night and thought it was one of the best ones, even though they didnt have a lot of the details from the book. i was dissappointed that they didnt have scenes like the funeral for Dumbledore, etc. the movie also seemed to focus more on the teenage relationships than the action. it also didnt seemed rushed like the 5th one did. obviously the book is much better than the movie but i still think the movie is worth seeing.
07/18/2009, 5:26 pm
So it is that bad? I have to see it to believe it ? I have to talk to one of my cousins and if it was good or not ? I can't belive the years has passed it feels like yesterday when they did the first harry potter movie? I can't believe he is gay?
07/18/2009, 5:17 pm
MOST MOVIES ARE NOT ALWAYS JUST LIKE THE BOOKS> YOu people are completely naive, i say! How is a 600 some page book going to be made into a movie? It would have been two parts if it could fit everything. It was an interpretation. Live and learn.
07/18/2009, 5:09 pm