NYT Magazine had an interview this weekend with Wallace Shawn, of "My Dinner With Andre" fame,  who's film "Marie and Bruce" is a Sundance 2004 selection.

Geoffrey Gilmore gushes: Theatricality on screen is not often effective. Rarely is it emotionally satisfying, and when it's used as a theoretical or cerebral conceit, well, frankly, it's been done! That's what I thought, and then I saw Marie and Bruce and realized that maybe there were possibilities that hadn't been explored.  Wallace Shawn's study of the breakdown of a couple's relationship is certainly the opposite of the naturalistic or realistic aesthetic that most cinema adopts. In fact, director Tom Cairns and Shawn have created a world which is almost an abstract ideal. But juxtapose a nearly retrograde theatrical language, absurdist in tone and inflection, with a stagy setting, combined with a digitalized phantasmagorical projection of fantasies and desire, and two of the best actors in the business, and the results are wonderful. Julianne Moore and Matthew Broderick lead the cast of this chronicle of contemporary ennui and frustration. The depths of their dysfunctionality are quickly revealed and instantly recognizable. But Marie and Bruce isn't a painfully arduous trek through relationship hell. In fact, it's rather delightful, brimming with nasty wit, observations, and humor that are as insightful as they are self-reflexive. Unpredictable and intensely personal, Marie and Bruce is proof that theater ain't dead.

categories Cinematical