Not too long ago, we learned thatDavid Mamet and Disney were coming together for a new take on The Diary of Anne Frank. The project was said to merge Frank's famous diary with the Tony Award-winning stage production and Mamet's own spin as -- believe it or not -- a "coming of age" story. Mamet + Disney + Frank -- it sounded too strange to be real, and it looks like Disney agrees.

Just over a month later, The Wrap reports that the project has been thrown into turnaround. It seems that this wasn't exactly a film about Frank (thank god), but rather "a pro-Israel exploration of anti-Semitism set in contemporary times," about "a contemporary Jewish girl who goes to Israel and learns about the traumas of suicide bombing." According to sources, Disney said the spin was "too dark." (One can only wonder why it took Disney a month to come to this realization when we all suspected it from the beginning.) One executive said: "It's very intense, and dark and scary. It's not a film version of The Diary of Anne Frank."

That begs the question: Why frakking call it The Diary of Anne Frank if it's not about her? If the film is set in modern times, and not about Anne Frank hiding out during WWII, why not call it something else? Why capitalize on one dead girl's name? And while we're on the topic -- why did Disney pick this to begin with? Did they think Mamet would have Anne tiptoeing through the tulips and singing "fa-la-la"?

categories Movies, Cinematical