Plot: Platinum Dunes revives the Nightmare on Elm Street franchise with this reworking of slasher film legend Freddy Krueger, a deceased child killer who torments the dreams of the teenagers of Springwood, OH. Read More
Latest on A Nightmare on Elm Street
No genre puts out more movies every month than the horror genre. Sure, big studio films always take the spotlight, but nearly every Tuesday of the year finds a handful of straight-to-video horror movies hitting store shelves. For any other month, sorting...
It's remake time on the home theater front this week as 'The Karate Kid' and 'A Nightmare on Elm Street,' two classic films from 1984, come to the fore. Some people get riled up about remakes -- enough, they say -- but remakes have been around since the...
Okay, Hollywood. We've already established that this is the Summer of '84 all over again. It began this spring, actually, when Freddy poked his burn-scarred face back into theaters for a hot second in A Nightmare on Elm Street, but in the past month, The...
Forget those rumors you heard last week about Robert Englund possibly reprising his role as Freddy Kruger (a franchise re-launch of A Nightmare on Elm Street was confirmed last week). They may not be true. But also forget what you might have read today...
Halloween is once again here, which means it's the one time of the year where even non-horror fans start looking for scary movies to watch. While the various cable channels provide an abundance of fright flicks during the last week of the month...
Your Reviews
What is there to be said about Nightmare that hasn't been said yet? For people fresh to the fold, it's a decent enough movie, with its scary moments... and plenty of teen blood on the walls to entertain well enough. For returning members of Freddy's long-running series of nightmares, it's atrocious. Without Englund, Freddy feels awkward and poorly imitated by the man who gave us Rorshak from Watchmen. They could have tried better, yes, on Freddy's overall look, as the makeup vaguely resembles an oversized rat at the best of times and for heaven's sake, did they have to try taking it ALL the way back to the days when all he did was use the glove? Part of the appeal of Freddy Kruegar was the originality in his delivery and the manic way he seemed to ENJOY warping reality to humiliate and play with his victims before delivering the coop de grace. Further, what made him entertaining was that he was a child MURDERER. Spoiler alert: they made Freddy into a raving pervert for this movie and nothing more. To sum it all up, the bad points are that Freddy himself just sucked. Now, the GOOD stuff. The idea of a 72 hour limit was interesting, and the thought that there is literally NO escape from dreams was terrifying in its own right. You knew Freddy had you no matter what you did in this movie, and that gave it a new edge to an old razor glove. Could they have done better? Yeah, definately. Could they have done worse? Oh yeah they could. I give this movie a three out of five for making it halfway to the mark, but ultimately falling short of what we love about our resident master of nightmares, but at the same time giving us something fresh. Put Englund (or at least someone with his energy) back in the makeup and let's try this again, hollywood. Tanks for reading, fellow movielovers! Full Review
It wasn't extremely bad, I think it was watchable. But there was nothing different about this movie.
yuck! it was terrible! where is robert enland. this freddy sucked. he looked retarded!
BEAST
its alright
