The reviews have been savage. The Globe and Mail called it "completely, atrociously, perhaps even impressively, stupid." Detroit News dubbed it "the most puzzlingly bad movie of the year." The Seattle Times noted, "The first half-hour feels like there's no plot at all, just a highlights reel of Random Norwegian Crime Films In Which Everything Is Ominous and Everyone Looks Really Cold."
It currently holds an 11% Critics Score on Rotten Tomatoes, with audiences ranking it an ice cold 30%.
He told the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation (translated by The Independent). "We didn't get the whole story with us and when we started cutting we discovered that a lot was missing. It's like when you're making a big jigsaw puzzle and a few pieces are missing so you don't see the whole picture."
Alfredson added the the greenlight to shoot came "very abruptly," and that about 10-15 percent of the screenplay wasn't even filmed. Which makes for a lot of plot holes.
Many critics noted that the movie makes no sense and the ending comes out of nowhere. As critic Robert Horton wrote, the story (based on the novel by Jo Nesbø) "might have been confusing even if the movie didn't appear to have been edited with an immersion blender."
For Detective Harry Hole, the death of a young woman during the first snowfall of winter feels like anything but a routine homicide. His investigation leads him to "The Snowman Killer," an elusive sociopath who continuously taunts Hole with cat-and-mouse games. As the vicious murders continue, Harry teams up with a brilliant recruit to try and lure the madman out of the shadows before he can strike again. Read More