City Slickers II: The Legend of Curly's Gold Poster
43
metacriticBased on 23 Critics

Release Date: June 10th, 1994

DVD Release Date: April 1st, 2003

PG-13|1 hr 56 min

Plot Summary
Two years after a momentous cattle drive under the guidance of cowboy Curly (Jack Palance) in the first "City Slickers," Curly has passed away, and Mitch (Billy Crystal) discovers the dead man's treasure map, which shows the location of a hidden cave containing the stash. With his brother Glen (Jon Lovitz) and best friend Phil (Daniel Stern), Mitch sets out to find Curly's gold. On the trail, the trio once again battle danger, this time with the help of Curly's twin brother, Duke (Palance).

Cast: Billy Crystal, Daniel Stern, Jon Lovitz, Jack Palance, Patricia Wettig, Pruitt Taylor Vince, Bill McKinney, Lindsay Crystal

Director: Paul Weiland

Genres: Comedy

Production Co: Castle Rock Entertainment, Columbia Pictures Corporation

Distributors: Warner Home Vídeo, Columbia Pictures

Keywords: Quest, Wife, Friend, New York City, Madcap, Husband, Brother, 1990s

More on Wikipedia

Watch Online

Cast & Crew

view all

Ratings & Reviews

view all
  • 50
    Steven ReaPhiladelphia Inquirer

    City Slickers I managed to poke fun at the whole Iron John/discover-your- maleness movement at the same time the film was able to embrace it. But while City Slickers II tries for the same mix, it doesn't work. Instead, we get shots of three smelly, unshaven guys getting blubbery and hugging each other. [10 June 1994, p.03]

  • 75
    Michael WilmingtonChicago Tribune

    City Slickers II, perhaps, isn't really special. But it's the kind of movie Hollywood should churn out more often: a professional, ebullient, formula entertainment that doesn't insult your intelligence and hits its marks with ease, wit and good humor. Unlike most current mega-movies, it's classy, smart, sometimes gaudily tasteless fun-done with such zest and skill that it often makes you smile. And laugh. And maybe even smirk. show more

  • 75
    St. Louis Post-Dispatch

    The movie goes on a little too long, partly because of one of those we're-not-finished-yet second endings that seem obligatory these days. But, as mindless comedy, the movie is highly entertaining. [10 June 1994, p.3H]

See all critic reviews on metacritic.com