Your Reviews
Great
Horrible, pass away from this film, is one of the worst remakes I've ever seen, completely offended the history of classic character. A movie trash... hat is best done by this succession of horrors, awful story, horrible special effects, fights evil tested, only the actor Jason Momoa is saved well by incorporating the role of Conan. For the rest go away from this film Full Review
I'm 55 and went to see Arnold's version back when I was in my 20's. Although I enjoyed his version better. I still enjoyed this one. I was in the... d for action and that's what I got. I went into it realizing that the action would overshadow the acting (it usually does in strong action flicks) so I was not bothered by it. Despite this I thought the movie was still pretty good. Full Review
This guy is a little to puny to fill the shoes of Arnold. Needed to bulk up just a little bit more to play this role. Good action not enough acting
I absolutely loved Conan! I am BIG fan of Jason Momoa first and foremost but I enjoyed the show itself also. Yes there was a lot of blood etc. but... hey are barbarians, back then it's how they lived. I'm going to see it again just as soon as I can! :-) Full Review
Critic Reviews
Brutal, bloody beyond belief, and has no socially redeeming value. So it is with a certain amount of guilt that I say it's kind of a wicked blast to watch, especially if you're in the mood for some righteous revenge.Full Review
Mr. Momoa has some awfully big biceps to fill. He rises to that task with a pumped physique made for ogling. Thankfully, he also shows glints of self-awareness that can make hypermasculine blowouts like these more watchable and were largely missing from Mr. Schwarzenegger's wide-eyed turn in the first "Conan the Barbarian" (1982).Full Review
There's something and nothing for everyone in Conan the Barbarian 3D.Full Review
Those nostrils do a lot of Momoa's acting, to be honest. As right as he is looks-wise, Momoa falls short in attitude.Full Review

