Skip to main content

Viewer Score

68
Viewer score based on 23 votes.

Critic Score

36
Critics' score based on 16 reviews.
powered by Metacritic ™

Your Reviews

not as good as saw 3 but still good

November 4, 2008
Lil mikey 1012

Time to fire the new blood writers and bring back the old blood. Time to forgive and forget the writers strike, and start making some good movies again because lately there has been a great deal of cr... ap, like Saw4. Utter urine! Horrid! Full Review

May 22, 2008
jdlewis60

This sequel sucked!!! I went on opening night and everyone left the theatre mad as hell. It was dry and whack!!They should have stopped at Saw III, that was the best one.

May 22, 2008
jennelle22

I haven't seen it but I have seen all the the other ones... but this, i have heard that this movie is really good and there is one really gross scene! I am a little bit mad that they don't answer some... questions... like where is eric matthews? What happened to his son? Also the beginning of this movie does make sense because in the end of the 3rd movie he is dying and that doctor had to treat for him but she failed so the device that she was wearing smashed her head. People wonder why he begins on an autopsy scan... hmmm lets think... obvious! He died in the 3rd movie because the doctors husband shot him and his heart rate stopped which caused the doctor's device on her head to go off. It goes off when jigsaws heart rate stops. I know this is a lot to say, but it should make sense why he would begin on an autopsy table. Maybe you guys should go look up the defintition of an autopsy! lol Enjoy the movie i heard it's good! Full Review

May 22, 2008
theregoestaylor

definately not my favorite of the series but it did keep me interested the whole time. not the goriest film of the series but very lucrative kills this time around. but now its starting to get a littl... e farfetched, seriously how many tape recorders can a dead guy perfectly place? i counted like 20 more of them in this film. plus i dont really see why they would continue making the series, everyone is pretty much there and gone and the only unanswered question is WHAT THE HELL HAPPEND TO DR GORDON Full Review

May 22, 2008
ferniedog2u
Showing 1 of (of )

Critic Reviews

Torture, you may recall, used to be an unparsable, unpardonable sin. Now it's porn.Full Review

Marc Savlov
Austin Chronicle

Director Darren Lynn Bousman, who also helmed the past two installments, doesn't deviate from the stylistic formula, which includes grinding industrial music, frenzied editing and a blue-gray color palette.Full Review

Frank Scheck
The Hollywood Reporter

Even by the standards of the recent "Saws," which have enjoyed considerably larger budgets than the first pic, the new edition is more frenetically cut (by editors Kevin Greutert and Brett Sullivan), more dimly lit (by lenser David A. Armstrong), sweatier in terms of perfs by the grimly serious cast, more madly packed with micro-incidents and action, and more brazen in requiring suspension of disbelief.Full Review

Robert Koehler
Variety

If an hour and a half of so-called "torture porn" sounds like fun, you'll find Saw IV situated somewhere between the first in the cycle (a solid original with plenty of energy in it) and the last (a gasping copycat willing to do anything to stay alive).Full Review

Elizabeth Weitzman
New York Daily News

Saw IV is bloody proof that Jigsaw may be dead, but his well of corporeal abuses has yet to run dry.Full Review

Jeannette Catsoulis
The New York Times
Showing 1 of (of )

Add Your Review for Saw IV

Netflix

Netflix - Try for Free

Instantly watch TV episodes and movies via the Internet on your computer or TV. 1 month FREE!

Facebook Activity