Skip to main content

reviews

26
Based on 19 Reviews
critic reviews (10)
fan reviews ( )
  • NA
    Peter Travers Rolling Stone

    When studios plant these stink bombs in theaters, do they really think that audiences won't notice the stench? show more

  • 50
    Mick LaSalle San Francisco Chronicle

    It's entertainment, but mild entertainment. show more

  • 25
    Andy Seiler USA Today

    Poor Sharon Stone! Poor Sidney Lumet! [22 January 1999, Life, p.11E] show more

  • 63
    Liam Lacey The Globe and Mail (Toronto)

    If the external threat in the plot were a little more credible, this would be an annoying distraction. But in the context of the rest of Gloria, it's a safe strategy: When not watching Sharon Stone act, audiences can fall back on just watching Sharon Stone. show more

  • 50
    John Petrakis Chicago Tribune

    The shadow of Gena Rowlands looms over this picture like a cinematic eclipse. [25 January 1999, Tempo, p.5] show more

  • 50
    James Berardinelli ReelViews

    Just because it's not boring, that doesn't mean it's worth plunking down the price of admission. show more

  • 40
    TV Guide

    A pale imitation of the John Cassavettes original. show more

  • 30
    Merle Bertrand Film Threat

    Listless clunker. show more

  • 20
    Steve Davis Austin Chronicle

    While the somewhat indefatigable Stone may survive this misfire (she's survived plenty of others), Lumet may not. show more

  • 50
    Owen Gleiberman Entertainment Weekly

    Stone's latest penance is Gloria, the Sidney Lumet-directed dud that sprung from the singularly bad idea of remaking John Cassavetes' oddball 1980 character study. I mean, really, did anyone even like the original? show more

My Settings

You are currently subscribed as: {email}


Subscriptions

Get the latest reviews, movie news, photos, and trailers sent straight to your inbox.

Weekly Newsletter

Daily alerts

Movies

You're not following any movies.

These are the movies you’re currently following.


    Update settings
    X